Your So-Called Liberal Media at Work

"The Times delayed publication of drafts of the eavesdropping article before the 2004 election."

I can't think of any reason voters would be interested about Presidential lawbreaking *before* an election.

Apparently though, it's all an issue of "fairness":

"Holding a fresh draft of the story just days before the election also was an issue of fairness, Mr. Keller said. I agree that candidates affected by a negative article deserve to have time — several days to a week — to get their response disseminated before voters head to the polls."

All the news that's fit to print (unless it's an article about Presidential lawbreaking and there's not enough time for the President's PR team to spin it)

(via TalkLeft)